SOUTH DAKOTA

SCHOOL OF MINES
& TECHNOLOGY


Directories
Current Students
Faculty & Staff
Local Weather

Student Development Theories
Psychosocial

New Page 1

Notes primarily from:

Student Development in College, Evans, Forney & Guido-DiBrito. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998

Compiled by Pat Mahon; please contact her for source books and additional references.

Other bibliographic resources include:

Learning Reconsidered

Learning Reconsidered 2

Good Practices in Student Affairs

Back to main theory page

PSYCHOSOCIAL THEORY
examines personal and interpersonal lives and operates under the notion that personal development is on-going through the life span.

Erik Erikson, a psychologist, influenced this genre through his description of life stages and sequence of developmental tasks. He had profound influence on psychosocial theory in the following three ways.

  1.  “Epigenetic principle”—“anything that grows has a ground plan, and that out of this ground plan the parts arise, each part having its time of special ascendancy, until all parts have arisen to form a functioning whole.”

  2. Erikson theorizes there are eight stages or periods when biological and psychological changes interact with sociocultural demands presenting a “crisis” which he defines as a time for decision requiring serious consideration of and a significant choice among alternative courses of action.

  3. In college age students, Erikson identifies the “identity versus identity confusion” crisis as the dominant development task.  Identity development in regard in the change among college students is a major component in most psychosocial theories.

 Arthur Chickering, the most well known student development theorist, built on the works of Erikson and in the late 1960s he described seven vectors of development that cumulatively contribute to self identity. He teamed with L. Reisser, and in the 1990s they presented a revised theory presenting a comprehensive overview of psychosocial development during the college years. The seven vectors are:

  1.  Developing competence. Three kinds of competence develop in college–intellectual competence, physical and manual skills, and interpersonal competence.

  2. Managing emotions. Students develop the ability to recognize, accept, express and control emotions.

  3. Moving through autonomy toward interdependence. A key developmental step for students is learning to function with relative self-sufficiency, to take responsibility for pursuing self-chosen goals, and to be less bound by others’ opinions.

  4. Developing mature interpersonal relationships. Developing mature relationships involves tolerance and appreciation of differences and the capacity for intimacy.

  5. Establishing identity. Identity formation builds on the other vectors already mentioned: competence, emotional maturity, autonomy, and positive relationships. Development of identity involves: comfort with body and appearance; comfort with gender and sexual orientation; sense of self in a social, historical, and cultural context; clarification of self-concept through roles and life-style; sense of self in response to feedback from valued others; self-acceptance and self-esteem; and personal stability and integration.

  6. Developing purpose. Developing clear vocational goals, committing to personal interests and activities and establishing strong interpersonal commitments even when there is opposition are the key to developing purpose.

  7. Developing Integrity. Developing integrity involves three sequential but overlapping stages: humanizing values-shifting away from automatic application of uncompromising beliefs and using principled thinking in balancing one’s own self-interest with the interests of others; personalizing values-consciously affirming core values and beliefs while respecting other points of view; and developing congruence-matching personal values with socially responsible behavior.

Identity models were built on Chickering’s work as follows:

 James Marcia, ego identity status:  Marcia reasoned that forming of this status is a dynamic process involving a crisis pertaining to the engagement of choice among meaningful but competing alternatives, and the making of occupational and ideological commitments.  He identified four responses to identity formation:

  • Identity-diffused: have neither experienced a crisis nor made a commitment

  • Foreclosure: have not undergone any crisis and have not made commitments

  • Moratorium:  actively involved in a crisis period and have not reached a commitment

  • Identity-achieved: have successfully weathered a crisis and have made a commitment

 Ruthellen Josselson offers a research based discussion of Marcia’s theory in an application for women’s identity development.

  • Foreclosures (purveyors of the heritage): women who graduate from college with identity commitment but without experiencing identity crisis

  • Identity Achievements (pavers of the way): women who break the psychological ties to their childhood and form separate, distinct identities

  • Moratoriums (daughters of the crisis): is an unstable time of experimenting and searching for new identities

  • Identity Diffusions (lost and sometimes found): there is a lack of crisis and commitment with a tendency to withdraw from situations

William E. Cross, Jr., developed a model regarding African American identity development.

Stage 1, Pre-encounter or pre-discovery: person’s world view in dominated by the white culture

Stage 2, Encounter: involves an experience that confronts the person’s understanding of black’s place in the world and leads to a restating of views and beliefs

Stage 3, Immersion-Emersion: a personal search for understanding of self as a black person

Stage 4, Internalization: with four possible outcomes—

1) Continuation and rejection

2) Continuation and fixation at stage 3

3) Internalization that brings in inner security and satisfaction but no commitment to action

4) Internalization-commitment—commitment and plan to participate in the reformation of the black community

 Janet Helms proposed a white identity model based on the abandonment of racism (through 3 statuses—contact, disintegration and reintegration) and the defining of a non-racist white identity (through 3 statuses—pseudo-independence, immersion-emersion, and autonomy). 

Jean Phinney is known for her three stages Model of Ethnic identity Development.  She feels ethnic identity is important to development of a positive self-concept for minority adolescents.

Stage 1, Diffusion-Foreclosure: a person has not yet explored ethnic identity

Stage 2, Moratorium: a person is increasingly aware and is exploring his/her ethnic identity

Stage 3, Identity Achievement: a healthy bicultural identity is achieved

 Vivienne Cass developed a six stage theory of homosexual identity development that has both a cognitive (how an individual views self) and an affective (how one feels about self and others’ perceptions).  The stages are:  identity confusion, identity comparison, identity tolerance, identity acceptance; identity pride and identity synthesis.

Anthony D’Augelli developed the model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development as a “social construction” shaped by varying degrees of social events and the environment throughout the life span.

 

 


Contact: SDSM&T VP Student Affairs & Dean of Students

This page has been visited 20,749 times since 11/01/2004
http://www.hpcnet.org/dos/theory_psychosocial Last Modified: 11/01/2004

 
     

© - 1994-2012 - SDSM&T - All rights Reserved.